Tuesday, September 4, 2018

YouTube video with links to Nat Rich chat with THE DAILY show at the New York Times re What Went Wrong with Climate Fight 1979-1989











https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3wMKGLW-aI







Blogged by Dan Bloom




Thirty years ago, the United States had a chance to stop global warming in its tracks. Almost nothing stood in the way — except human resistance.



Rafe Pomerance, an environmentalist who became involved with the climate movement in its earliest days.


Nathaniel Rich, who reported on the history of climate politics for The New York Times Magazine.




Image Rafe Pomerance, center, with other activists in Noordwijk, the Netherlands, in 1989 for the first major diplomatic meeting on global warming. CreditFrom Daniel Becker Background reading: Read “Losing Earth,” Nathaniel Rich’s magazine feature about the decisive decade when humans first began to grasp the causes and consequences of global warming. Tune in, and tell us what you think. Email us at thedaily@nytimes.com. Follow Michael Barbaro on Twitter: @mikiebarb. And if you’re interested in advertising with “The Daily,” write to us at thedaily-ads@nytimes.com.

ADVERTISEMENT How do I listen to ‘The Daily’?July 16, 2018 Nathaniel Rich contributed reporting. “When We Almost Stopped Climate Change” was produced by Clare Toeniskoetter, with help from Michael Simon Johnson, and edited by Paige Cowett and Lisa Tobin. “The Daily” is produced by Theo Balcomb, Annie Brown, Jessica Cheung, Paige Cowett, Lynsea Garrison, Michael Simon Johnson, Andy Mills, Rachel Quester, Ike Sriskandarajah and Clare Toeniskoetter, with editing help from Larissa Anderson. Lisa Tobin is our executive producer. Samantha Henig is our editorial director. Brad Fisher is our technical manager. Chris Wood is our sound engineer. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...




































@xxx So xxxx did nice xxxx profile of u, here. But u r now an advocate of cli-fi novels, u revised yr earlier thinking, which xxxxx refuses to acknowledge in her repeated attacks. In PacStan QA u bravo cli-fi. Tell her. Pls delete outdated yr 2016 blog.















































@xxxxx xxxx, yu blocked me on earlier twitter ID. so this only way to reach you, mate. xxxx did nice profile of u, today. But u r now an advocate of cli-fi novels, u revised yr earlier thinking, which xxxx refuses to acknowledge in her repeated ''attacks''. update her!



0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes



 Reply


 Retweet





Like



 Direct message








 More

































Replying @xxxxx @xxxxx Nice profile of xxx, xx. But xxxxxis now an advocate of cli-fi novels, he revised his earlier thinking, which xxxx refuses to acknowledge in her repeated attacks. In PacStan QA he stands up for cli-fi novelists and says bravo. Ask him. xxxxx?